Today, we are diving into the conversation about how government price setting proposals could impact the Medicare Part D program and beneficiaries. Imposing Veterans Administration (VA)-style pricing in the Part D program has been suggested as a way to lower costs. However, a recent study found that imposing VA-style pricing in Part D would have significant, negative long-term implications for patients.
The study adds to a large body of evidence that shows patients could lose out under these short-sighted proposals. As the Congressional Budget Office and others have repeatedly indicated, direct government negotiation in Part D would not produce any savings in Medicare unless restrictions were placed on beneficiary access to needed medicines.
Additionally, the proposals threaten the marked improvements in longevity that the Medicare population has seen since the implementation of Part D in 2006. For example, a study in The American Journal of Managed Care found that nearly 200,000 Medicare beneficiaries have lived at least 1 year longer, with an average increase in longevity of 3.3 years since Part D implementation.
It’s clear these government price control proposals could only hurt patients and negatively affect the Medicare Part D program. Learn more about Medicare Part D and the importance of ensuring the program continues to provide seniors and individuals with disabilities access to affordable prescription drug coverage.